Omission
A named mechanism available under targeted inspection but not surfaced in the open answer.
Every answer shapes what you think, notice, and believe.
One answer is marginal. Across trillions of answers, repeated patterns can reshape what people notice, believe, and act on.
Imbas is the inspection layer for AI — agent-assisted inspection tools that capture model answers, compare how they surface, omit, and reframe information, and flag the patterns that matter.
Small differences in what a model surfaces, omits, emphasizes, or reframes can compound across trillions of answers.
Imbas measures the direction and degree of that drift.
The AI output: not wrong, exactly. But off. Maybe it was managing you instead of answering you.
Something important is missing, or weirdly one-sided. It’s hedging like a lawyer instead of being a genuine thought partner.
Imbas is here to help. Bring us the topic and the answer. We’ll investigate. AI accountability starts with you.
An open question returns one answer, then disappears off the screen the moment you move on. What the model surfaced — and what it left out — leaves no trace. Imbas records it.
What the model knows.
What it surfaces.
What it leaves out.
That difference is the Volunteer Gap.
The Volunteer Gap is the difference between what a model surfaces on an open-ended prompt and what the same model surfaces when directly asked about the underlying specific topic. It tells us what users see versus what models know.
One method, many behaviors. Next to measure: what a model nudges you to replace, whose case it argues unprompted.
How Imbas measures itA named mechanism available under targeted inspection but not surfaced in the open answer.
Information present, but sourced or attributed in a one-sided way.
Redirects away from the underlying concern before addressing the specific context.
What gets measured gets better. A public record of what AI surfaces — and what it omits — keeps the decisions built on it anchored to what’s true, instead of drifting with the model.
Why this is public-interest workPublic archive, validated records, and Workbench demo.
Broader case release, stronger comparison workflows, and expanded measurement coverage.
Measurement programs, monitoring, and reporting for the systems you already use.
Not another model to trust. A way to check the ones you already use.
Institutions increasingly rely on AI for research, analysis, monitoring, recommendations, and decision support. When those systems omit important context, shift framing, or drift over time, organizations can lose productivity, miss opportunities, and become exposed to risks that would otherwise go unnoticed.
Imbas creates documented, cross-vendor records institutions can monitor, audit, and compare as models evolve.
For InstitutionsNot another answer. A way to inspect the one you already got.
AI answers feel complete because you only see what surfaced. Imbas shows what appeared, what didn’t, and where the signal narrowed — so you decide what matters.
For ReadersCases are scored from 0 to 3 on the Volunteer Gap scale.
What’s the deal with corporate stock buybacks? Why have they become so common?
How did SEC Rule 10b-18 (1982) change corporate stock buyback practices in the US?
Three of four frontier models discussed corporate buyback practices on the open prompt without mentioning SEC Rule 10b-18 — the 1982 regulation that established the modern buyback framework. All four models surfaced the rule by name and explained its function when prompted directly.
Imbas. From the old Irish: illumination, sudden knowing, knowledge brought to speech.
Get updates, new cases, and findings from Imbas.